| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
SCUBA
(Been Here Awhile)
USA
584 Posts |
 Posted - 04/17/2013 : 11:45:50 AM
|
| The Toledo Blade reported that the Cyclones were going to be called for a penalty just before the Cyclones scored the game tying goal, I felt the Walleyes were going to be called for interference, anyone see it differently? |
|
|
Reggie Dunlop
(The Next Level!)
USA
399 Posts |
Posted - 04/17/2013 : 11:58:43 AM
|
Nick reported on air that the Walleyes were going to be penalized for a cross check, I believe, so Houser was on his way to the bench. The penalty was then erased with Wilson's goal.
|
 |
|
|
SCUBA
(Been Here Awhile)
USA
584 Posts |
Posted - 04/17/2013 : 12:06:50 PM
|
| Thank You, all I saw was the call for a penalty and a Clone on the gice. Houser was already on the bench as far as I know, but if the call was against the Clones then play would have ended when a Clone touched the puck, Right? I didn't at all like the officials in the game...but like everyone says "you have to play above the refs". Like I said, the toledo blade reports there was a delayed penalty against the clones just before the tying score. |
|
|
|
Reggie Dunlop
(The Next Level!)
USA
399 Posts |
Posted - 04/17/2013 : 2:36:20 PM
|
Scuba, you're correct, if it would have been a penalty against the Cyclone, then play would have been whistled dead. It sounded like a Cyclone player was cross-checked somewhere behind the net and that's what the call was going to be. So, if Toledo had somehow controlled the puck, play would have been whistled and the Cyclone would have been on the PP for the remaining 5 seconds. I could only listen thanks to America One's incompetence and awful customer support.
I wish there were video highlights, but I can't seem to find any.
|
|
|
|
King Of The Monkeys
(Finally Got A Star!)
70 Posts |
Posted - 04/17/2013 : 3:31:41 PM
|
| Toledo showed the play repeatedly on their videoboard. Was definitely a cross check called by the ref about 3 seconds before the goal. |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Topic Locked
